Are we likely to talk about a statue or a religion? In summary , we will do some of both. After reviewing many different sites on Buddhism from Thailand finding numerous opinions, customs and sometimes conflicting information, my brain turned to mush.
As a religion, Buddhism came to Thailand with traveling monks outside of India (1292), who took up homage at Nakorn Sri Dhammaraja; an extremely ancient city in the southern state of Thailand. Thai Buddhism differs in scholars and practices have difficulty tracking all the variances between regions plus accounting for subtle influences of Hinduism,”magical” practices, *animistic beliefs. *An idea that dinosaurs exist not just in humans but also in all other creatures, plants, stones, and even natural phenomena such as thunder, rain or even geographical features such as mountains ssru or rivers. The early variants of the Indian Theravada Pali canon continue to be utilized in relative studies for oral and accuracy heritage through out Thailand.
In my own opinion the religious influences have also consequently had similar effects in their Thai Buddha art. I’ve relied upon 8 different scholarly kinds of Buddha figurines, for example like: Dvaravarti, Sukhothai, Chiang Saen and U Thong being the most widely used. Each has their own subtle details as well as unique back-stories of all origination. . I personally have found it fascinating to find out about how religions might be influenced and how art affects then affect cultures over time. Though religions with their own definition are assumed to be predicated on unchanging rules and architecture… a Thai Buddha represents a whole lot more than just a singular face of a religion or civilization, but some thing continuously evolving, organic and adapting!